Maxima branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp SBCL 1.5.0
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) run_testsuite(share_tests = only)
Testsuite run for SBCL 1.5.0:
Running tests in rtestflatten: 43/43 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_z_transform: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-UNIT-STEP in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-POCHHAMMER in DEFUN
36/36 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeilberger_extreme: 9/9 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeilberger: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_boolsimp: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::PARSE-CONDITION in DEFUN
48/48 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_eigen: 13/13 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_odelin: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-UNK in DEFUN
105/105 tests passed
Running tests in rtestezunits: 280/280 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_numericalio: 69/69 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_simplify_sum: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-UNK in DEFUN
76/76 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_solve_rec: 30/30 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_stringproc: 82/82 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_opproperties: 117/117 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_stats: 14/14 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_distrib: 86/86 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_descriptive: 109/109 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_interpol: 18/18 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_levin: 104/104 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_fractals: 11/11 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bernstein: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-HYPERGEOMETRIC in DEFUN
44/44 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_atensor: 20/20 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_ctensor: 45/45 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_itensor: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::$NAME in DEFUN
STYLE-WARNING:
2 calls to MAXIMA::$UNDIFF were compiled before a compiler-macro was defined
for it. A declaration of NOTINLINE at the call sites will eliminate this
warning, as will defining the compiler-macro before its first potential use.
STYLE-WARNING:
2 calls to MAXIMA::$CONTRACT were compiled before a compiler-macro was
defined for it. A declaration of NOTINLINE at the call sites will eliminate
this warning, as will defining the compiler-macro before its first potential
use.
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DERIV in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SDIFF in DEFUN
STYLE-WARNING:
2 calls to MAXIMA::$IDIFF were compiled before a compiler-macro was defined
for it. A declaration of NOTINLINE at the call sites will eliminate this
warning, as will defining the compiler-macro before its first potential use.
STYLE-WARNING:
1 call to MAXIMA::$FLUSHND was compiled before a compiler-macro was defined
for it. A declaration of NOTINLINE at the call site will eliminate this
warning, as will defining the compiler-macro before its first potential use.
STYLE-WARNING:
1 call to MAXIMA::$SHOWCOMPS was compiled before a compiler-macro was
defined for it. A declaration of NOTINLINE at the call site will eliminate
this warning, as will defining the compiler-macro before its first potential
use.
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::I-$DEPENDENCIES in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::$DECSYM in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::$CANFORM in DEFUN
58/58 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_dlsode:
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/odepack/src/xerrwd.lisp
; in: DEFUN XERRWD
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT ("~1@T" ("~A") "~%") ODEPACK::MSG)
; --> LET WHEN IF REPLACE
; ==>
; ODEPACK::LUNIT
;
; note: deleting unreachable code
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT
; ("~6@T" "In above message, I1 =" 1 (("~10D")) "~%")
; ODEPACK::I1)
; --> LET WHEN IF REPLACE
; ==>
; ODEPACK::LUNIT
;
; note: deleting unreachable code
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT
; ("~6@T" "In above message, I1 =" 1 (("~10D")) "~3@T"
; "I2 =" 1 (("~10D")) "~%")
; ODEPACK::I1 ODEPACK::I2)
; --> LET WHEN IF REPLACE
; ==>
; ODEPACK::LUNIT
;
; note: deleting unreachable code
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT
; ("~6@T" "In above message, R1 =" 1
; (("~21,13,2,0,'*,,'DE")) "~%")
; ODEPACK::R1)
; --> LET WHEN IF REPLACE
; ==>
; ODEPACK::LUNIT
;
; note: deleting unreachable code
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT
; ("~6@T" "In above, R1 =" 1 (("~21,13,2,0,'*,,'DE")) "~3@T"
; "R2 =" 1 (("~21,13,2,0,'*,,'DE")) "~%")
; ODEPACK::R1 ODEPACK::R2)
; --> LET WHEN IF REPLACE
; ==>
; ODEPACK::LUNIT
;
; note: deleting unreachable code
; (DEFUN ODEPACK::XERRWD
; (ODEPACK::MSG ODEPACK::NMES ODEPACK::NERR ODEPACK::LEVEL ODEPACK::NI
; ODEPACK::I1 ODEPACK::I2 ODEPACK::NR ODEPACK::R1 ODEPACK::R2)
; (DECLARE (TYPE (DOUBLE-FLOAT) ODEPACK::R2 ODEPACK::R1)
; (TYPE (F2CL-LIB:INTEGER4) ODEPACK::NR ODEPACK::I2 ODEPACK::I1
; ODEPACK::NI ODEPACK::LEVEL ODEPACK::NERR ODEPACK::NMES)
; (TYPE (STRING *) ODEPACK::MSG))
; (F2CL-LIB:WITH-MULTI-ARRAY-DATA
; ((ODEPACK::MSG CHARACTER ODEPACK::MSG-%DATA% ODEPACK::MSG-%OFFSET%))
; (PROG ((ODEPACK::LUNIT 0) (ODEPACK::MESFLG 0))
; (DECLARE (TYPE # ODEPACK::MESFLG ODEPACK::LUNIT))
; (SETF ODEPACK::LUNIT #)
; (SETF ODEPACK::MESFLG #)
; (IF (= ODEPACK::MESFLG 0)
; (GO ODEPACK::LABEL100))
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT ("~1@T" # "~%") ODEPACK::MSG)
; (IF (= ODEPACK::NI 1)
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT # ODEPACK::I1))
; (IF (= ODEPACK::NI 2)
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT # ODEPACK::I1 ODEPACK::I2))
; (IF (= ODEPACK::NR 1)
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT # ODEPACK::R1))
; (IF (= ODEPACK::NR 2)
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT # ODEPACK::R1 ODEPACK::R2))
; ODEPACK::LABEL100 ...)))
; --> PROGN SB-IMPL::%DEFUN SB-IMPL::%DEFUN SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA
; ==>
; #'(SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA ODEPACK::XERRWD
; (ODEPACK::MSG ODEPACK::NMES ODEPACK::NERR ODEPACK::LEVEL ODEPACK::NI
; ODEPACK::I1 ODEPACK::I2 ODEPACK::NR ODEPACK::R1 ODEPACK::R2)
; (DECLARE (SB-C::TOP-LEVEL-FORM))
; (DECLARE (TYPE (DOUBLE-FLOAT) ODEPACK::R2 ODEPACK::R1)
; (TYPE (F2CL-LIB:INTEGER4) ODEPACK::NR ODEPACK::I2 ODEPACK::I1
; ODEPACK::NI ODEPACK::LEVEL ODEPACK::NERR ODEPACK::NMES)
; (TYPE (STRING *) ODEPACK::MSG))
; (BLOCK ODEPACK::XERRWD
; (F2CL-LIB:WITH-MULTI-ARRAY-DATA
; ((ODEPACK::MSG CHARACTER ODEPACK::MSG-%DATA% ODEPACK::MSG-%OFFSET%))
; (PROG (# #)
; (DECLARE #)
; (SETF #)
; (SETF #)
; (IF #
; #)
; (F2CL-LIB:FFORMAT ODEPACK::LUNIT # ODEPACK::MSG)
; (IF #
; #)
; (IF #
; #)
; (IF #
; #)
; (IF #
; #)
; ODEPACK::LABEL100 ...))))
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; The variable NMES is defined but never used.
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; The variable NERR is defined but never used.
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/odepack/src/dsolsy.lisp
; in: DEFUN DSOLSY
; (DEFUN ODEPACK::DSOLSY (ODEPACK::WM ODEPACK::IWM ODEPACK::X ODEPACK::TEM)
; (DECLARE (TYPE (ARRAY F2CL-LIB:INTEGER4 (*)) ODEPACK::IWM)
; (TYPE (ARRAY DOUBLE-FLOAT (*)) ODEPACK::TEM ODEPACK::X
; ODEPACK::WM))
; (LET ()
; (SYMBOL-MACROLET ((ODEPACK::EL0 #)
; (ODEPACK::H #)
; (ODEPACK::IERSL #)
; (ODEPACK::MITER #)
; (ODEPACK::N #))
; (PROG (# # # # # # # #)
; (DECLARE #
; #)
; (SETF #)
; (F2CL-LIB:COMPUTED-GOTO # ODEPACK::MITER)
; ODEPACK::LABEL100
; (ODEPACK::DGESL # ODEPACK::N ODEPACK::N # ODEPACK::X 0)
; (GO ODEPACK::END_LABEL)
; ODEPACK::LABEL300
; (SETF #)
; (SETF #)
; (SETF #) ...))))
; --> PROGN SB-IMPL::%DEFUN SB-IMPL::%DEFUN SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA
; ==>
; #'(SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA ODEPACK::DSOLSY
; (ODEPACK::WM ODEPACK::IWM ODEPACK::X ODEPACK::TEM)
; (DECLARE (SB-C::TOP-LEVEL-FORM))
; (DECLARE (TYPE (ARRAY F2CL-LIB:INTEGER4 (*)) ODEPACK::IWM)
; (TYPE (ARRAY DOUBLE-FLOAT (*)) ODEPACK::TEM ODEPACK::X
; ODEPACK::WM))
; (BLOCK ODEPACK::DSOLSY
; (LET ()
; (SYMBOL-MACROLET (# # # # #)
; (PROG # # # # ODEPACK::LABEL100 # # ODEPACK::LABEL300 # # # ...)))))
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; The variable TEM is defined but never used.
;
; compilation unit finished
; caught 3 STYLE-WARNING conditions
; printed 5 notes
22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_fourier_elim: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPAPPLY in DEFMACRO
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPCONS in DEFMACRO
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::CARTESIAN-PRODUCT in DEFUN
145/145 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sequence: 54/54 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_cholesky: 41/41 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_eigens_by_jacobi: 24/24 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_lu: 52/52 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_linalg: 214/214 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_polynomialp: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_matrixexp: 59/59 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_romberg: 19/19 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_wilcoxon:
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-AMATRIX-COLUMN
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::AI MAXIMA::J MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-ROW-AMATRIX
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::I MAXIMA::AJ MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-AMATRIX-AMATRIX
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::AI MAXIMA::AJ MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-BOOLEAN-COLUMN
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::B MAXIMA::J MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-ROW-BOOLEAN
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::I MAXIMA::B MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/amatrix/amatrix.lisp
; in: DEFUN AMATRIX-ASSIGN1-BOOLEAN-BOOLEAN
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::AA MAXIMA::B1 MAXIMA::B2 MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
;
; compilation unit finished
; caught 6 STYLE-WARNING conditions
29/29 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bitwise: 71/71 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_gf: 10/10 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_namespaces: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::INTERN-INVERT-CASE in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-ATOM in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:MAKESTRING in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::REMVALUE in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::KILL1 in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:MSIZE-ATOM in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-PREFIX in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-INFIX in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-NARY in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-POSTFIX in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-NOFIX in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIMENSION-MATCH in DEFUN
85/85 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_arag: 107/107 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_pdiff: 90/90 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_to_poly: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPAPPLY in DEFMACRO
********************** Problem 13 (line 40) ***************
Input:
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(sqrt(a) = b)), [a, b]))
Result:
2
[b - a]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 14 (line 43) ***************
Input:
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(sqrt(a) = sqrt(b))), [a, b]))
Result:
[b - a]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 15 (line 46) ***************
Input:
1/3
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(a = b)), [a, b]))
Result:
3
[b - a]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 16 (line 49) ***************
Input:
1/42
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(a = b)), [a, b]))
Result:
42
[b - a]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 17 (line 52) ***************
Input:
1/4 1/3
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(a = b )), [a, b]))
Result:
4 3
[b - a ]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 18 (line 57) ***************
Input:
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(abs(a) = b)), [a, b]))
Result:
2 2
[b - a ]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 19 (line 60) ***************
Input:
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(abs(a) = abs(b))), [a, b]))
Result:
2 2
[b - a ]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 20 (line 63) ***************
Input:
first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly(abs(1 - abs(1 - abs(a))))), [a]))
Result:
2
[a (a - 4)]
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 25 (line 80) ***************
Input:
first(first(elim_allbut(first(to_poly((x - 1) (x - sqrt(2)) (x - sqrt(3)),
[x, 1])), [x])))
Result:
2 3 2
(x - 3) (x - x - 2 x + 2)
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
16/16 tests passed (not counting 9 expected errors)
The following 9 problems passed but were expected to fail: (13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 25)
Running tests in rtestprintf: 66/66 tests passed (not counting 5 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_simplex: 18/18 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_graphs: 99/99 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_abs_integrate: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPAPPLY in DEFMACRO
********************** Problem 107 (line 338) ***************
Input:
a b
e : integrate(x (1 - x) , x)
Result:
- (hypergeometric([- a, b + 1], [b + 2], 1 - x) (1 - x)
a log(x) + b log(1 - x) a
%e )/((b + 1) x )
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 108 (line 341) ***************
Input:
a b
rat(hypergeometric_simp(subst([a = 1, b = 3], x (1 - x) - diff(e, x))), x)
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 109 (line 344) ***************
Input:
a b
rat(hypergeometric_simp(subst([a = 2, b = 3], x (1 - x) - diff(e, x))), x)
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 110 (line 347) ***************
Input:
a b
rat(hypergeometric_simp(subst([a = 2, b = 4], x (1 - x) - diff(e, x))), x)
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 111 (line 350) ***************
Input:
a b
rat(hypergeometric_simp(subst([a = - 4, b = 3], x (1 - x) - diff(e, x))), x)
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 112 (line 354) ***************
Input:
ratsimp(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(sqrt(x) (1 - x), x)
- integrate(sqrt(x) (1 - x), x)))
Result:
4
- --
15
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 113 (line 357) ***************
Input:
14 5 3
rat(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(5 x (1 - x ) , x)
14 5 3
- integrate(5 x (1 - x ) , x)))
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 114 (line 360) ***************
Input:
4
e : hyper_int(4 x sqrt(1 - x ), x)
Result:
1 1 3 4 2
2 hypergeometric([- -, -], [-], x ) x
2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 115 (line 363) ***************
Input:
4
taylor(diff(e, x), x, 0, 15) - 4 x sqrt(1 - x )
Result:
0 + . . .
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 116 (line 366) ***************
Input:
5/2 7
e : hyper_int(7 x sqrt(1 - x ), x)
Result:
1 1 3 7 7/2
2 hypergeometric([- -, -], [-], x ) x
2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 117 (line 369) ***************
Input:
5/2 7
taylor(diff(e, x), x, 0, 15) - 7 x sqrt(1 - x )
Result:
0 + . . .
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 118 (line 372) ***************
Input:
2
(x - 1) (x + 1) (x + 1)
rat(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(------------------------, x))
3
x
2
(x - 1) (x + 1) (x + 1)
- integrate(------------------------, x))
3
x
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 119 (line 375) ***************
Input:
- x
logcontract(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(------------, x)
2
x - 2 x + 1
- x
- integrate(------------, x)))
2
x - 2 x + 1
Result:
log(- 1) + 1
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 120 (line 378) ***************
Input:
2
- x
logcontract(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(------------, x)
2
x - 2 x + 1
2
- x
- integrate(------------, x)))
2
x - 2 x + 1
Result:
1
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 121 (line 381) ***************
Input:
3
- x
logcontract(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(------------, x)
2
x - 2 x + 1
3
- x
- integrate(------------, x)))
2
x - 2 x + 1
Result:
log(- 1) + 1
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 123 (line 387) ***************
Input:
logcontract(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(e, x) - integrate(e, x)))
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 125 (line 393) ***************
Input:
logcontract(hypergeometric_simp(hyper_int(e, x) - integrate(e, x)))
Result:
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
log(16) - 3
- -----------
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 126 (line 397) ***************
Input:
2 1/3 2
sqrt(x) (x - x + 1) (11 x - 11)
hyper_int(------------------------------------, x)
2 5/6 4 2
(x + 1) (x + 2 x + 1)
Result:
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
2
11 1 5 x + 1 11/6
6 hypergeometric([- --, - -], [- -], ------) x
6 3 6 x
--------------------------------------------------
2 11/6
(x + 1)
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 127 (line 400) ***************
Input:
3 1/3
hyper_int(4 (1 - x ) , x)
Result:
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
2 4 7 2 2
hypergeometric([-, -], [-], - (x - 1) (x + x + 1)) (x - 1) (x + x + 1)
3 3 3
3 1/3
(1 - x )
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
log: encountered log(0).
log: encountered log(0).
log: encountered log(0).
********************** Problem 178 (line 565) ***************
Input:
%pi
integrate(log(abs(sin(x))), x, 0, ---)
2
Result:
log: encountered log(0).
attempt to THROW to a tag that does not exist: ERRORSW
2
8 %i li (%i) + 8 %i li (- %i) - 4 %pi log(2) + %i %pi 2
2 2 %i %pi
------------------------------------------------------ - -------
8 12
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
178/178 tests passed (not counting 22 expected errors)
The following 20 problems passed but were expected to fail: (107 108 109 110
111 112 113 114
115 116 117 118
119 120 121 123
125 126 127 178)
Running tests in rtest_pochhammer:
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/orthopoly/orthopoly.lisp
; in: DEFUN USE-HYPERGEO
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
;
; compilation unit finished
; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition
36/36 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_to_poly_solve: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPAPPLY in DEFMACRO
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::OPAPPLY in DEFMACRO
********************** Problem 12 (line 38) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = - 1, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 13 (line 41) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 14 (line 44) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = 42.1, x)
Result:
5925048259759309 5925048259759309
%union([x = - ----------------], [x = ----------------])
140737488355328 140737488355328
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 15 (line 47) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = - 42.1, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 16 (line 50) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = 4.21b1, x)
Result:
23700193039037235 23700193039037235
%union([x = - -----------------], [x = -----------------])
562949953421312 562949953421312
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 17 (line 53) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = - 4.21b1, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 18 (line 56) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = a, x)
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(a), [x = - a], %union()),
%if(isnonnegative_p(a), [x = a], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 19 (line 59) ***************
Input:
!1 !1 !! !1 !1 !!
%solve(!- - !- - x!! = !- - !- - sqrt(5)!!, x, simpfuncs = ['expand])
!5 !5 !! !5 !5 !!
Result:
2
%union([x = - - sqrt(5)], [x = sqrt(5)])
5
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 20 (line 62) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x - 1) = 2, x)
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 3])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 21 (line 65) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(2 x + 5) = abs(x - 2), x)
Result:
%union([x = - 7], [x = - 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 22 (line 68) ***************
Input:
%solve(1 - abs(x) = max((- x) - 2, x - 2), x)
Result:
3 3
%union([x = - -], [x = -])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 23 (line 73) ***************
Input:
%solve(max(x, 1) = 2, x)
Result:
%union([x = 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 24 (line 76) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(max(x, 1) = -, x)
2
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 25 (line 79) ***************
Input:
sol : %solve(max(x, 1) = a, x)
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(a - 1), [x = a], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 26 (line 82) ***************
Input:
1
subst(a = -, sol)
2
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 27 (line 85) ***************
Input:
subst(a = 2, sol)
Result:
%union([x = 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 28 (line 88) ***************
Input:
%solve(min(x, 1) = 2, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 29 (line 91) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(min(x, 1) = -, x)
2
Result:
1
%union([x = -])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 30 (line 94) ***************
Input:
sol : %solve(min(x, 1) = a, x)
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(1 - a), [x = a], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 31 (line 97) ***************
Input:
1
subst(a = -, sol)
2
Result:
1
%union([x = -])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 32 (line 100) ***************
Input:
subst(a = 2, sol)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 33 (line 103) ***************
Input:
3
2 x
%solve(max(2 - x , x) = max(- x, --), x)
9
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 3])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 34 (line 106) ***************
Input:
3
2 x
%solve(max(2 - x , x) = --, x, 'algexact = false)
9
Result:
%union([x = - 3], [x = - 1.55489417989418], [x = 3])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 35 (line 109) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(max(x, x ) = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 36 (line 112) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(min(x, x ) = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 37 (line 115) ***************
Input:
%solve([max(x, y) = a, min(x, y) = b], [x, y])
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(a - b), [x = a, y = b], %union()),
%if(isnonnegative_p(a - b), [x = b, y = a], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 38 (line 118) ***************
Input:
%solve([max(x, 1) + min(x, y) = 7, x - y = a], [x, y], simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
%union(%if((isnonnegative_p((- a) - 5)) %and (isnonnegative_p(a)),
a 5
[x = a + 6, y = 6], %union()), %if((isnonnegative_p(- + -))
2 2
a 7 7 a
%and (isnonnegative_p(a)), [x = - + -, y = - - -], %union()),
2 2 2 2
7 7
%if(isnonnegative_p(- a), [x = -, y = - - a], %union()))
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 39 (line 123) ***************
Input:
%solve(sqrt(x) = 1 + %i, x)
Result:
%union([x = 2 %i])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 40 (line 126) ***************
Input:
%solve(sqrt(x) = (- 1) + %i, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 41 (line 129) ***************
Input:
%solve(sqrt(x) = a, x)
Result:
%pi %pi 2
%union(%if((- --- < parg(a)) %and (parg(a) <= ---), [x = a ], %union()))
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 42 (line 132) ***************
Input:
1/3
%solve(x = - 1, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 43 (line 135) ***************
Input:
1/3
%solve(x = 1 + %i, x)
Result:
%union([x = 2 %i - 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 44 (line 138) ***************
Input:
1/3
%solve(x = a, x)
Result:
%pi %pi 3
%union(%if((- --- < parg(a)) %and (parg(a) <= ---), [x = a ], %union()))
3 3
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 45 (line 141) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(sqrt(x + 1) = x - 2, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 46 (line 144) ***************
Input:
%solve(x + sqrt(x) = 2, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 47 (line 147) ***************
Input:
1/4
%solve(2 sqrt(x) + 3 x - 2 = 0, x)
Result:
1
%union([x = --])
16
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 49 (line 153) ***************
Input:
sol : %solve(sqrt(x) - sqrt(1 - x) = a, x, simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
2
%pi a - sqrt(2 - a )
%union(%if((- --- < parg(- ----------------))
2 2
2
%pi 2 a - sqrt(2 - a ) %pi
%and (- --- < parg(sqrt(2 - a ) + a)) %and (parg(- ----------------) <= ---)
2 2 2
2
2 %pi a sqrt(2 - a ) 1
%and (parg(sqrt(2 - a ) + a) <= ---), [x = -------------- + -], %union()),
2 2 2
2
%pi 2 %pi sqrt(2 - a ) + a
%if((- --- < parg(a - sqrt(2 - a ))) %and (- --- < parg(- ----------------))
2 2 2
2
2 %pi sqrt(2 - a ) + a %pi
%and (parg(a - sqrt(2 - a )) <= ---) %and (parg(- ----------------) <= ---),
2 2 2
2
1 a sqrt(2 - a )
[x = - - --------------], %union()))
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 50 (line 156) ***************
Input:
[subst(a = - 10, sol), subst(a = - 1, sol), subst(a = 0, sol),
subst(a = 1, sol), subst(a = 10, sol)]
Result:
1
[%union(), %union([x = 0]), %union([x = -]), %union([x = 1]), %union()]
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 70 (line 224) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve(sin(sqrt(x)) = 0, x))
Result:
%pi %pi 2 2
%union(%if((- --- < parg(%z0)) %and (parg(%z0) <= ---), [x = %pi %z0 ],
2 2
%union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 72 (line 230) ***************
Input:
1/3 1/3
block([domain : complex], (%solve(x = a , x), subst(a = - 1, %%)))
Result:
%union([x = - 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 73 (line 233) ***************
Input:
1/3 1/3
(%solve(x = a , x), subst(a = 1, %%))
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 76 (line 242) ***************
Input:
subst(a = 7, sol)
Result:
%union([x = - 7], [x = 7])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 77 (line 245) ***************
Input:
subst(a = %i, sol)
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 78 (line 248) ***************
Input:
(assume(abs(a) < 1), %solve([abs(1 - abs(x)) = abs(1 - abs(a))], [x]))
Result:
%union([x = 2 - abs(a)], [x = abs(a) - 2], [x = - abs(a)], [x = abs(a)])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 86 (line 275) ***************
Input:
%solve([abs(x) = abs(a)], [x])
Result:
%union([x = - abs(a)], [x = abs(a)])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 87 (line 278) ***************
Input:
%solve([abs(1 - abs(x)) = abs(1 - abs(a))], [x])
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(1 - abs(abs(a) - 1)), [x = 1 - abs(abs(a) - 1)],
%union()), %if(isnonnegative_p(1 - abs(abs(a) - 1)),
[x = abs(abs(a) - 1) - 1], %union()), [x = (- abs(abs(a) - 1)) - 1],
[x = abs(abs(a) - 1) + 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 88 (line 281) ***************
Input:
3/2
%solve(x = a, x)
Result:
%pi 1/3
%union(%if((- --- < parg((sqrt(3) %i - 1) a ))
2
2/3
1/3 %pi (sqrt(3) %i + 1) a
%and (parg((sqrt(3) %i - 1) a ) <= ---), [x = - ---------------------],
2 2
1/3
%pi (sqrt(3) %i + 1) a
%union()), %if((- --- < parg(- ---------------------))
2 2
1/3 2/3
(sqrt(3) %i + 1) a %pi (sqrt(3) %i - 1) a
%and (parg(- ---------------------) <= ---), [x = ---------------------],
2 2 2
%pi parg(a) parg(a) %pi 2/3
%union()), %if((- --- < -------) %and (------- <= ---), [x = a ], %union()))
2 3 3 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 89 (line 284) ***************
Input:
!! 1! 1!
%solve(!!x - -! - -! = sqrt(5), [x])
!! 5! 5!
Result:
3/2
5 + 2
%union([x = - sqrt(5)], [x = --------])
5
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 90 (line 287) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) = sqrt(5), [x])
Result:
%union([x = - sqrt(5)], [x = sqrt(5)])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 96 (line 307) ***************
Input:
%solve(23 = sqrt(1 - x) sqrt(x + 1) + %i x, x, simpfuncs = ['rectform])
Result:
264 %i
%union([x = - ------])
23
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 97 (line 311) ***************
Input:
2 %i %pi
%solve(log(sqrt(1 - x ) + %i x) = ------, x)
6
Result:
1
%union([x = -])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 120 (line 401) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(sqrt(x + 1) = 2 - x, x)
Result:
3
%union([x = -])
4
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 124 (line 415) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(sqrt(x + 1) = x - 2, x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 125 (line 418) ***************
Input:
%solve(x + sqrt(x) = 2, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 126 (line 421) ***************
Input:
1/4
%solve(2 sqrt(x) + 3 x - 2 = 0, x)
Result:
1
%union([x = --])
16
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 127 (line 424) ***************
Input:
%solve(sqrt(log(x)) = log(sqrt(x)), x)
Result:
4
%union([x = 1], [x = %e ])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 128 (line 433) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x - 1) = 2, x)
Result:
%union([x = - 1], [x = 3])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 129 (line 436) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(2 x + 5) = abs(x - 2), x)
Result:
%union([x = - 7], [x = - 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 130 (line 439) ***************
Input:
%solve(1 - abs(x) = max((- x) - 2, x - 2), x)
Result:
3 3
%union([x = - -], [x = -])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 134 (line 459) ***************
Input:
%solve(sqrt(log(x)) = log(sqrt(x)), x)
Result:
4
%union([x = 1], [x = %e ])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 135 (line 464) ***************
Input:
(declare(z, complex), %solve((1 + %i) z + (2 - %i) conjugate(z) = (- 3) %i, z,
'simpfuncs = ['rectform]))
Result:
%union([z = 3 %i + 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 136 (line 467) ***************
Input:
%solve(z + (5 - %i) conjugate(z) = 42, z, simpfuncs = ['rectform])
Result:
168 42 %i
%union([z = --- - -----])
25 25
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 138 (line 473) ***************
Input:
%solve(z + z conjugate(z) = 23, z, 'simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
sqrt(93) 1 sqrt(93) 1
%union([z = (- --------) - -], [z = -------- - -])
2 2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 139 (line 476) ***************
Input:
%solve(z + z realpart(z) = 23, z)
Result:
sqrt(93) - 1 sqrt(93) + 1
%union([z = ------------], [z = - ------------])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 142 (line 488) ***************
Input:
(eqn1 : x + y + z = 6, eqn2 : 2 x + y + 2 z = 10, eqn3 : x + 3 y + z = 10,
nicedummies(%solve([eqn1, eqn2, eqn3], [x, y, z])))
Result:
%union([x = %c0, y = 2, z = 4 - %c0])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 143 (line 494) ***************
Input:
%solve(a + x - sqrt(x), x, simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
%pi sqrt(1 - 4 a) - 1
%union(%if((- --- < parg(- -----------------))
2 2
sqrt(1 - 4 a) - 1 %pi sqrt(1 - 4 a) 1
%and (parg(- -----------------) <= ---), [x = (- a) - ------------- + -],
2 2 2 2
sqrt(1 - 4 a) 1
%union()), [x = (- a) + ------------- + -])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 144 (line 503) ***************
Input:
%solve(x - 2 sqrt(x) = 10, x)
Result:
%union([x = 2 sqrt(11) + 12])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 146 (line 510) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve([y sin(x) = 0, cos(x) = 0], [x, y]))
Result:
2 %pi %z0 + %pi
%union([x = ---------------, y = 0])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 148 (line 518) ***************
Input:
%solve([abs(a00 - 4 a02) = 1, abs(a00 - 4 a01 + 4 a02) = 1,
abs(a00 + 4 a01 + 4 a02) = 1], [a00, a01, a02])
Result:
1 1 1
%union([a00 = - 1, a01 = 0, a02 = 0], [a00 = - -, a01 = - -, a02 = -],
2 4 8
1 1 1 1
[a00 = - -, a01 = -, a02 = -], [a00 = 0, a01 = 0, a02 = - -],
2 4 8 4
1 1 1 1
[a00 = 0, a01 = 0, a02 = -], [a00 = -, a01 = - -, a02 = - -],
4 2 4 8
1 1 1
[a00 = -, a01 = -, a02 = - -], [a00 = 1, a01 = 0, a02 = 0])
2 4 8
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 149 (line 524) ***************
Input:
%solve(x - sqrt(x) + a, x, 'simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
%pi sqrt(1 - 4 a) - 1
%union(%if((- --- < parg(- -----------------))
2 2
sqrt(1 - 4 a) - 1 %pi sqrt(1 - 4 a) 1
%and (parg(- -----------------) <= ---), [x = (- a) - ------------- + -],
2 2 2 2
sqrt(1 - 4 a) 1
%union()), [x = (- a) + ------------- + -])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 157 (line 551) ***************
Input:
%solve([x = 2, y = x + 3, y = 1], [x, y])
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 158 (line 554) ***************
Input:
%solve([x = 2, y = 3, y = 1], [x, y])
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 159 (line 559) ***************
Input:
%solve(x - 2 sqrt(x) = 10, x)
Result:
%union([x = 2 sqrt(11) + 12])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 162 (line 571) ***************
Input:
2
%solve(2 x = sqrt(x + 3), x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 163 (line 575) ***************
Input:
2
2 2 2 x 2 x y
%solve([log(y + x ) + ------- = 0, -------], [x, y])
2 2 2 2
y + x y + x
Result:
- 1
%union([x = 0, y = - 1], [x = 0, y = 1], [x = - %e , y = 0],
- 1
[x = %e , y = 0])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 164 (line 579) ***************
Input:
3
10 q 5 q
%solve([------------ - ----------- = 5.07], [q], 'algexact = false)
2 2 3/2
sqrt(q + 3) (q + 3)
Result:
%union([q = 1.423962227031281], [q = 10.01077844311377],
[q = - 2.201201253088263 %i])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 165 (line 585) ***************
Input:
%solve([x2 = x cos(phi) - y sin(phi), y2 = x sin(phi) + y cos(phi)], [x, y],
'simpfuncs = ['trigreduce])
Result:
%union([x = sin(phi) y2 + cos(phi) x2, y = cos(phi) y2 - sin(phi) x2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 169 (line 610) ***************
Input:
2 2 2 2 2 2
%solve([x + y = 2 , (x - 1) + (y - 1) = 2 ], [x, y], 'use_grobner = true,
'simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
1 sqrt(7) sqrt(7) 1 sqrt(7) 1 1 sqrt(7)
%union([x = - - -------, y = ------- + -], [x = ------- + -, y = - - -------])
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 173 (line 624) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + 3 y = 5, sqrt(x + y) - 1 = y], [x, y])
Result:
3/2 3/2
%union([x = 11 - 3 2 , y = 2 - 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 179 (line 644) ***************
Input:
3/2
%solve(x = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 180 (line 647) ***************
Input:
4/3
%solve(x = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 181 (line 650) ***************
Input:
5/3
%solve(x = 1, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 196 (line 701) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + x y = a, x y = 8], [x, x y])
Result:
%union([x y = 8, x = a - 8])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 197 (line 704) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + x y = a, x y = 8 + z, x - z + 78], [x, x y, z])
Result:
a + 86 a - 86 a + 70
%union([x y = ------, x = ------, z = ------])
2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 198 (line 707) ***************
Input:
2
%solve([abs(x y - 1) = a, a - x y], [x y, a])
Result:
sqrt(5) - 3 sqrt(5) - 1
%union([x y = - -----------, a = -----------],
2 2
sqrt(5) + 3 sqrt(5) + 1
[x y = -----------, a = -----------])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 199 (line 711) ***************
Input:
%solve([m x = b], [x], 'parameters = [m, b], 'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies])
Result:
%union(%if((b = 0) %and (m = 0), [x = %c0], %union()),
b
%if(m # 0, [x = -], %union()))
m
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 200 (line 714) ***************
Input:
2 2 2
%solve([y + x = a , y + x = 1], [x, y], 'parameters = [a, b],
'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies, 'expand])
Result:
2 2
2 sqrt(2 a - 1) - 1 sqrt(2 a - 1) + 1
%union(%if(2 a - 1 # 0, [x = - ------------------, y = ------------------],
2 2
2
2 sqrt(2 a - 1) + 1
%union()), %if(2 a - 1 # 0, [x = ------------------,
2
2
sqrt(2 a - 1) - 1 1
y = - ------------------], %union()), %if((a = - -------) %and (b = %c0),
2 sqrt(2)
1 1 1 1 1
[x = -, y = -], %union()), %if((a = -------) %and (b = %c0), [x = -, y = -],
2 2 sqrt(2) 2 2
%union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 201 (line 720) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + y = a, x + y = b], [x, y], 'parameters = [a],
'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies])
Result:
%union(%if(b - a = 0, [x = %c0, y = b - %c0], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 202 (line 723) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + y = a, x + a y = b], [x, y], 'parameters = [a, b],
'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies, 'expand])
Result:
2
b - a b - a
%union(%if(a - 1 # 0, [x = - ------, y = -----], %union()),
a - 1 a - 1
%if((a = 1) %and (b = 1), [x = %c0, y = 1 - %c0], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 203 (line 726) ***************
Input:
%solve([y + b x = a, a y + x = b], [x, y], 'parameters = [],
'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies, 'ratsimp])
Result:
2 2
b - a b - a
%union([x = - -------, y = -------])
a b - 1 a b - 1
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 204 (line 729) ***************
Input:
%solve([y + x = a, a y + x = b], [x, y], 'parameters = [a, b],
'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies, 'expand])
Result:
2
b - a b - a
%union(%if(a - 1 # 0, [x = - ------, y = -----], %union()),
a - 1 a - 1
%if((a = 1) %and (b = 1), [x = %c0, y = 1 - %c0], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 207 (line 744) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + y = 1, sqrt(x + 1) = 1], [x, y])
Result:
%union([x = 0, y = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 208 (line 748) ***************
Input:
2 2 2 2 2 2
%solve([x + y = 2 , (x - 1) + (y - 1) = 2 ], [x, y], 'use_grobner = true,
'simpfuncs = ['expand])
Result:
1 sqrt(7) sqrt(7) 1 sqrt(7) 1 1 sqrt(7)
%union([x = - - -------, y = ------- + -], [x = ------- + -, y = - - -------])
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 210 (line 760) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve([b2 + a1 = r2, a1 b2 = r3, a2 b2 + a3 b1 = r4,
a3 b2 + a5 + r4 = d5, a5 b1 = 0], [a1, a2, a3, a5, r2, r3, r4, b1, b2],
'simpfuncs = ['expand]))
Result:
%union([a1 = %c0, a2 = %c1, a3 = %c2, a5 = d5 - %c2 %c3 - %c1 %c3, b1 = 0,
b2 = %c3, r2 = %c3 + %c0, r3 = %c0 %c3, r4 = %c1 %c3],
d5 %c5 %c6
[a1 = %c4, a2 = --- - ------- - %c5, a3 = %c5, a5 = 0, b1 = %c6, b2 = %c7,
%c7 %c7
r2 = %c7 + %c4, r3 = %c4 %c7, r4 = d5 - %c5 %c7])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 214 (line 778) ***************
Input:
%solve([a = b, b = 3], [a], 'parameters = [b])
Result:
%union(%if(b - 3 = 0, [a = 3], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 215 (line 782) ***************
Input:
%solve([x = 1, x = 2], x)
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 217 (line 794) ***************
Input:
2 t 2 2 t 2 2 t
nicedummies(%solve(sqrt(%e sin (t) + %e cos (t) + 3 %e ) = 2, t))
Result:
%union([t = %i %pi %z0])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 222 (line 816) ***************
Input:
2 2 2 2
%solve((4 k - 4) y + (4 - 4 k ) y + 6 k - 1, y, 'parameters = [k])
Result:
%union(%if((k - 1 # 0) %and (k # 0) %and (k + 1 # 0),
2 2
sqrt(5) k sqrt(1 - k ) - k + 1
[y = - -------------------------------], %union()),
2
2 k - 2
%if((k - 1 # 0) %and (k # 0) %and (k + 1 # 0),
2 2
sqrt(5) k sqrt(1 - k ) + k - 1
[y = -------------------------------], %union()),
2
2 k - 2
1
%if(k = 0, [y = -], %union()))
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 233 (line 858) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(x = sqrt(x) - -, x, 'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies])
4
Result:
1
%union([x = -])
4
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 234 (line 861) ***************
Input:
%solve(x = sqrt(x) + a %i, x, 'simpfuncs = ['nicedummies])
Result:
%pi sqrt(4 %i a + 1) - 1
%union(%if((- --- < parg(- --------------------))
2 2
sqrt(4 %i a + 1) - 1 %pi
%and (parg(- --------------------) <= ---),
2 2
sqrt(4 %i a + 1) - 2 %i a - 1
[x = - -----------------------------], %union()),
2
%pi
%if((- --- < parg(sqrt(4 %i a + 1) + 1))
2
%pi
%and (parg(sqrt(4 %i a + 1) + 1) <= ---),
2
sqrt(4 %i a + 1) + 2 %i a + 1
[x = -----------------------------], %union()))
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 241 (line 886) ***************
Input:
3/2 (- 1) + %i
block([algebraic : true], %solve(x = ----------, x,
sqrt(2)
simpfuncs = ['rectform]))
Result:
%i sqrt(3)
%union([x = (- --) - -------], [x = %i])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 243 (line 892) ***************
Input:
3/2
block([algebraic : true], %solve(x = - 1, x, simpfuncs = ['rectform]))
Result:
sqrt(3) %i 1 sqrt(3) %i 1
%union([x = (- ----------) - -], [x = ---------- - -])
2 2 2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 244 (line 895) ***************
Input:
3/2
block([algebraic : true], %solve(x = 1, x, simpfuncs = ['rectform]))
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 253 (line 925) ***************
Input:
%solve([x + 2 y = 5, 2 x - y = 5], [x, y])
Result:
%union([x = 3, y = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 262 (line 952) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(asin(sqrt(x)) = -, x, 'simpfuncs = ['expand, 'demoivre, 'expand])
5
Result:
2 1
%union([x = sin (-)])
5
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 263 (line 955) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(acos(sqrt(x)) = -, x, 'simpfuncs = ['expand, 'demoivre, 'expand])
5
Result:
2 1
%union([x = cos (-)])
5
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 268 (line 971) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve(a, x, 'parameters = []))
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 273 (line 986) ***************
Input:
%solve(abs(x) e = 10, [x])
Result:
10 10
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(--), [x = - --], %union()),
e e
10 10
%if(isnonnegative_p(--), [x = --], %union()))
e e
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 274 (line 990) ***************
Input:
%solve(z conjugate(z) + 3 (z - conjugate(z)) = 13 + 12 %i, z)
Result:
%union([z = 2 %i - 3], [z = 2 %i + 3])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 277 (line 1001) ***************
Input:
2 2 2
nicedummies(%solve([x + a y = 0, a x + b y = 0, a x + a b y = 0], [x, y],
'parameters = ['a, 'b]))
Result:
%union(%if((a = 0) %and (b = 0), [x = 0, y = %c6], %union()),
%if((a = %c0) %and (b = %c0), [x = - %c0 %c1, y = %c1], %union()),
%if((a = %c2) %and (b = - %c2), [x = - %c2 %c3, y = %c3], %union()),
%if((a = %c4) %and (b = %c5), [x = 0, y = 0], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 278 (line 1004) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve(a x = 0, [x], 'parameters = ['a]))
Result:
%union(%if(a = 0, [x = %c0], %union()), %if(a # 0, [x = 0], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 282 (line 1018) ***************
Input:
1
%solve(min(x, 1) = -, x)
2
Result:
1
%union([x = -])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 283 (line 1021) ***************
Input:
%solve(min(x, 1) = a, x)
Result:
%union(%if(isnonnegative_p(1 - a), [x = a], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 284 (line 1025) ***************
Input:
%solve([sqrt(x) - 1], [x])
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 285 (line 1028) ***************
Input:
1/3
%solve([x = 1], [x])
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 286 (line 1031) ***************
Input:
1/4
%solve([x = 1], [x])
Result:
%union([x = 1])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 287 (line 1034) ***************
Input:
%solve([max(x, 1) - 5], [x])
Result:
%union([x = 5])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 288 (line 1037) ***************
Input:
%solve([min(x, 1) = max(2, 7 - x)], [x])
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 289 (line 1040) ***************
Input:
%solve([abs(1 - abs(1 - abs(x))) = 42], [x])
Result:
%union([x = - 44], [x = 44])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 290 (line 1043) ***************
Input:
%solve([sqrt(x) = 10 - sqrt(x - 1)], [x])
Result:
10201
%union([x = -----])
400
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 291 (line 1046) ***************
Input:
%solve([sqrt(x) = min(x, 35)], [x])
Result:
%union([x = 0], [x = 1], [x = 1225])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 292 (line 1049) ***************
Input:
%solve([sqrt(x - y) = 2, sqrt(x + y) = 5], [x, y])
Result:
29 21
%union([x = --, y = --])
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 295 (line 1062) ***************
Input:
nicedummies(%solve([x + y = p1 - p2, x + 3 y = p2 - p3,
3 x - y = p1 + p2 + p3], [x, y], 'parameters = [p1, p2, p3]))
Result:
%union(%if((p1 = %c0) %and (p2 = %c1) %and (p3 = 8 %c1 - 4 %c0),
4 %c1 - %c0 6 %c1 - 3 %c0
[x = -----------, y = - -------------], %union()))
2 2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 296 (line 1066) ***************
Input:
2
subst(a = 1, %solve(log(x + sqrt(x - 1)) = a, x))
Result:
- 1 2
%e (%e + 1)
%union([x = ---------------])
2
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 299 (line 1076) ***************
Input:
sqrt(x) - 1
%solve(-----------, x)
x - 1
Result:
%union()
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 300 (line 1079) ***************
Input:
2
(x - 2) (sqrt(x) - 1)
%solve(----------------------, x)
x - 1
Result:
%union([x = - sqrt(2)], [x = sqrt(2)])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 311 (line 1127) ***************
Input:
%solve([a = 3 + x, b = 1 - x, x = 2], [x], 'parameters = [a, b])
Result:
%union(%if((a = 5) %and (b = - 1), [x = 2], %union()))
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 318 (line 1148) ***************
Input:
%solve(log(x - sqrt(x - 1)) = 0, x)
Result:
%union([x = 1], [x = 2])
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
185/185 tests passed (not counting 157 expected errors)
The following 128 problems passed but were expected to fail: (12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35
36 37 38 39 40 41
42 43 44 45 46 47
49 50 70 72 73 76
77 78 86 87 88 89
90 96 97 120 124
125 126 127 128
129 130 134 135
136 138 139 142
143 144 146 148
149 157 158 159
162 163 164 165
169 173 179 180
181 196 197 198
199 200 201 202
203 204 207 208
210 214 215 217
222 233 234 ...)
Running tests in rtest_hg: 187/187 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sym: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::SIMP-UNK in DEFUN
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/contrib/diffequations/odelin.lisp
; in: DEFUN HYPERGEO21-XI-DENOM-FILTER
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::N)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable N to be IGNORE
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/contrib/diffequations/odelin.lisp
; in: DEFUN HYPERGEO21-XI-DEGREE-BOUND
; (IGNORE MAXIMA::Q MAXIMA::V MAXIMA::X)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; Declaring special variable X to be IGNORE
;
; compilation unit finished
; caught 2 STYLE-WARNING conditions
********************** Problem 12 (line 42) ***************
Input:
symtest(phi, xi : sym , eta : sym , y, x)
1 2
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
********************** Problem 58 (line 181) ***************
Input:
dy
ode_check(-- = phi, % )
dx 1
Result:
0
... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
Maxima or SBCL.
55/55 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
The following 2 problems passed but were expected to fail: (12 58)
Running tests in rtest_nfloat: 50/50 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_mnewton: 16/16 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_solve_rat_ineq: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_vect: 46/46 tests passed (not counting 10 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_antid: 11/11 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bffac: 16/16 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_diff_form: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::MLIST* in DEFMACRO
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:MRELATIONP in DEFUN
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/contrib/format/format.lisp
; in: DEF-FORMATTER $%RATSUBST
; (MAXIMA::$LRATSUBST (MAXIMA::MLIST* MAXIMA::LISTOFEQNS) MAXIMA::EXPR)
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; undefined function: MAXIMA::$LRATSUBST
;
; compilation unit finished
; Undefined function:
; $LRATSUBST
; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition
36/36 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_grobner: 33/33 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_finance: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_fft:
; file: /home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/numeric/fft-core.lisp
; in: DEFUN FFT-R2-NN
; (/ MAXIMA-FFT::W MAXIMA-FFT::N)
;
; note: doing complex float to pointer coercion (cost 13)
;
; compilation unit finished
; printed 1 note
99/99 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_rfft: 46/46 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_decfp: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::DIM-BIGFLOAT in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::BIGFLOATP in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::BIGFLOAT2RAT in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::FP2FLO in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:$BFLOAT in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::TIMESBIGFLOAT in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::INVERTBIGFLOAT in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:MAKE-NUMBER in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:$RATIONALIZE in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::BIG-FLOAT-EVAL in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining MAXIMA:$REMAINDER in DEFUN
WARNING: redefining BIGFLOAT-IMPL:BIGFLOAT in DEFUN
4/4 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_wrstcse: 12/12 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_draw: 3 frames in animation sequence
132/132 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_engineering_format: WARNING: redefining MAXIMA::EXPLODEN in DEFUN
14/14 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
No unexpected errors found out of 4,115 tests.
Tests that were expected to fail but passed:
/home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/to_poly_solve/rtest_to_poly.mac problems:
(13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 25)
/home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/contrib/integration/rtest_abs_integrate.mac problems:
(107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 123 125 126
127 178)
/home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/to_poly_solve/rtest_to_poly_solve.mac problems:
(12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 50 70 72 73 76 77 78 86 87 88 89 90 96
97 120 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 134 135 136 138 139 142 143 144 146 148
149 157 158 159 162 163 164 165 169 173 179 180 181 196 197 198 199 200
201 202 203 204 207 208 210 214 215 217 222 233 234 241 243 244 253 262
263 268 273 274 277 278 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 295
296 299 300 311 318)
/home/maxima/maxima-test/installroot/share/maxima/branch_5_42_base_501_g876b4a2d3/share/contrib/diffequations/tests/rtest_sym.mac problems:
(12 58)
Evaluation took:
385.751 seconds of real time
381.451702 seconds of total run time (377.955039 user, 3.496663 system)
[ Run times consist of 10.094 seconds GC time, and 371.358 seconds non-GC time. ]
98.89% CPU
275,535 forms interpreted
303,931 lambdas converted
1,270,102,460,268 processor cycles
1 page fault
67,857,691,920 bytes consed
(%o0) done